A good friend of mine asked me to advise the daughter of a good friend of his about college and I gladly said yes. I spent 18 months much earlier in my career as the Associate Dean of Advisement and specialized in advising incoming students, both freshman as well as transfer. I recognize what an important difference advisement can make and am always willing to serve as an adviser. The daughter was interested in a very specialized niche area of business and also interested in a tiny college that specialized on that niche area. The young woman was just turning 18; she is not all that interested in higher education but she is very interested and highly motivated in making her mark in her intended field. The school she selected may be somewhat known in that niche area; it is certainly not known outside of that area. I am very familiar with many colleges and universities, especially in this area; her choice was one that I had never heard of.
Now I greatly admire her interest and determination to make her mark. Too few 18 year olds have a strong focus and too few really know what they want to do in their working lives. On the other hand, working in a niche area and being educated in only that area has its limitations. It is hard for me to remember back to when I was 18 but I am certain that I never thought of being an economist at that time and even more certain that I never considered working at a University. What I wanted to do and where I wanted to work evolved over time and by the middle of my doctoral education, I had made up my mind.
In talking to this young woman, her passion for working in the field she has chosen is clear and I spent no time at all questioning her decision. Instead I made two key points. First, keep an open mind toward other fields and other opportunities. Over time there may be another field that interests you and over time, opportunities in the field you have selected may become more robust, may remain as is, or may diminish and even dry up. No one comes with a crystal ball, keeping your options open is the next best thing to do. To keep your options open, a more general education is an important facilitator. Select a college or university that is at least somewhat well known and select a major that has more general applicability plus an internship in the niche area. That major, together with the internship, will serve you well in your niche area; it will also serve you well if interests and times change. By pursuing a more general major, you are often better positioned.
Now I’m not at all sure that my advice will be taken. I think it can be hard to change course when your passion has directed you toward one area and one goal. Passion often trumps practicality, but practicality when all is said and done usually carries the day.
Monday, October 28, 2013
Monday, October 21, 2013
Car Focus
It
is the time of year when the new automobile models are being introduced and as
usual I find myself looking to read everything I can about the new models. I have been fascinated by cars since I was a
young kid, and only later on did I realize how important the automobile
industry was to the American economy. Now I am not a believer that whatever is good for GM (or Ford of Chrysler) is good
for the United States, but I do believe that the American car industry doing
well is inextricably interwoven with the American economy doing well.
For
many years, the greatest excitement about the new models being introduced was
reserved for foreign cars, for the most part those cars imported either from
Germany or Japan. And the reality was that I was part of the foreign car
bandwagon. American cars didn’t excite
me and more importantly, I just didn’t have a sense that they were as durable
or well designed as the German or Japanese cars. Now American cars are at the
top of the list in almost every category.
The new Corvette, the new Impala, the new Cadillac CTS, the new Jeep
Cherokee, the new Ford Fusion are all the best of breed; tested continuously
and praised for all they represent and for all the value they provide. And because American cars are so good at
doing what they should do, it is no longer unusual to see American cars well
represented in important foreign cities.
Beijing and Buick is the best example.
In
many ways, the higher education industry is in a similar position. American higher education is respected at
home and around the globe. The impact of higher education on the economy –
taking into consideration all levels of public and private education– is huge,
and here too, the American economy doing well is dependent on higher education
continuing to do well. We need to be
relevant, we need to be reasonable, and we need to be a good investment in the
future. Foreign competition continues to
grow but in almost every area, our education is still the most sought after.
At
times, for the automobile industry, economic incentives have been key to the
public’s purchase of automobiles. No
money down, very low interest rates, low leasing rates, and discounts off the
sticker price have all made a difference.
Discount rates are key to higher education purchases as well. Either scholarships or well below cost public
tuition provide the same, price cutting, economic incentives. As the economy improved and as cars improved,
the automobile industry was able to reduce the reliance on price
incentives. In higher education, we are
still struggling with how to come to grips with price incentives. And what makes it especially difficult is
that public institutions may have exactly the same cost structure but because
there is a subsidy from the state where the public institution is located,
public institutions do their discounting up front and visible for all to
see. Imagine higher education, if Ford
were a public company with a permanent subsidy for all Ford purchasers. What would GM and Chrysler do?
I
know many of us – especially in the private section– are looking for ways to
reduce the increasing reliance in higher education on discounting to attract
students. Since it is no longer unusual
for a private institution to approach 50% in the first year discount rate, the
pace of discount rate increases by definition will slow down. But unfortunately, I don’t see a workable
solution for phasing out what so many of us have become dependent on.
Labels:
automobile industry,
cars,
discounting,
economy,
higher education,
new models
Monday, October 14, 2013
Ice Breaker
There are many situations where as an administrator or as a
not-for-profit board member it is necessary to engage strangers or almost
strangers in conversations for the good of the organization. Often these conversations go well but first
there is that awkward introductory phase. I am sure there are many good
alternatives but I have one that may be a guaranteed success. A cute dog is a great ice breaker.
The latest personal example of the effectiveness of a cute
dog was yesterday’s homecoming parade at my local school district. As a board of education member, I march in
the parade, which I enjoy doing, but there are always a significant number of
parents and students who I don’t know.
Yesterday, for the first time, I brought my dog along and thanks to her,
many, many marchers in the parade and many parade watchers came up to me to ask
about the dog (who by the way was dressed appropriately in the school
colors). Once the person has played with
the dog or you have talked about the dog, it is the perfect opening to a more
substantive conversation. For example
one dog-initiated conversation quickly turned to the topic of responsible
testing and the conversation was certainly worthwhile.
About a month ago, when my kids were both away, my wife and
I decided to spend the weekend in Manhattan and, since it is was easier than
making dog sitting arrangements, we decided to take our dog along. What a difference a dog makes. The first time I took her for a walk, shortly
after we arrived, I found myself in multiple conversations with individuals I
would never otherwise have a conversation with.
At one point, later in the weekend, when my wife and I were walking the
dog, we sat down on a bench in Battery Park city. The next thing I knew, we
were in a conversation with a young woman who was on the other end of the bench
and the woman’s terrier was sitting on my lap.
I must admit that my dog was very unhappy at the turn of events but we
all had a good conversation, especially once the terrier left my lap and my dog
took her rightful position.
As soon as we returned home, I called one of my friends who
is single and offered the dog as a weekend ice breaker if he wanted to spend
the weekend in the city. In my opinion
the dog has more potential than many social media sights to bring people
together.
I didn’t have a dog when I was growing up. I had fish and a parakeet. They were all terrific but with significant
limitations and none of them were walking companions and therefore unable to fulfill
an ice breaking role. When my kids
wanted a dog, my wife and I resisted feeling we would end up doing most of the
work and we were correct in that assumption.
But the dog has been a great addition to the family and we are all
thrilled with her. She is warm, loving,
playful, cute and all the good things you could want in a dog. And as an ice breaker she is awesome. I am already planning for other opportunities
where she will be my lead support in meet and great situations.
Labels:
conversation,
dogs,
ice breakers
Monday, October 7, 2013
Testing Woes
-->
The same period of adjustment should be built in for the transition to the common core. There are benefits inherent in having a common core, which is a common body of knowledge that every person should be exposed to as part of his or her education. If tests aren’t based on the common core, they certainly should be changed. But once again, it is all a question of how it is done. A test based on the common core should under any conditions follow the full implementation of the core.
My emails during the past week and the most recent meeting of the school board (which are public meetings) dealt overwhelmingly with testing and the overemphasis on test preparation. The public is clearly concerned and the reaction goes from there should be no testing in schools, to there should be responsible testing, to there should be a continued emphasis on testing. At the extremes there seem to be rather few people. No testing is unrealistic and also doesn’t provide the essential assessment mechanisms. Overemphasis on testing takes time away from other educational priorities and also saps the enjoyment out of learning. The third alternative, the push for responsible testing seems to have broad base support throughout the community and I am in total agreement. If the state will over time deal with issues they have created, I am certain the public will respond appropriately and positively.
Public School education in many states may need to change. But we only move ahead if the changes improve learning and comprehension, not if they create dissention and compromise learning in favor of testing. We very much need responsible testing and we especially need responsible public officials to effectively manage change.
New York State decided this year that they would
substantially raise the standards for passing the elementary and middle school
state mandated examinations. The
orientation of the exams was also changed to incorporate the common core
learning standards at the same time that the standards were first being
implemented. Not surprisingly, a much
larger percentage of students did not pass throughout the state and
consequently we now have a major public outcry and backlash against testing.
If the scores required for passing standardized examinations
are too low, no one would argue against raising the standards. But if the standards are being raised
dramatically, serious consideration should be given to phasing in the increase.
The most important reason for a phase-in is the detrimental impact of
dramatically raising standards on the students in our schools state wide. Instantly dramatically raising standards and
instantly dramatically increasing the percentage of students failing seriously
undermines the confidence and self-esteem of the students who have gone from
comfortably passing to seriously failing.
Since it clearly was the state’s fault that the standards were too low,
the state should at the very least build in the time necessary for the
adjustment to higher standards. Instead
of one year to totally revise standards, why not three years so that everyone
has a chance to adjust over time.
The same period of adjustment should be built in for the transition to the common core. There are benefits inherent in having a common core, which is a common body of knowledge that every person should be exposed to as part of his or her education. If tests aren’t based on the common core, they certainly should be changed. But once again, it is all a question of how it is done. A test based on the common core should under any conditions follow the full implementation of the core.
My emails during the past week and the most recent meeting of the school board (which are public meetings) dealt overwhelmingly with testing and the overemphasis on test preparation. The public is clearly concerned and the reaction goes from there should be no testing in schools, to there should be responsible testing, to there should be a continued emphasis on testing. At the extremes there seem to be rather few people. No testing is unrealistic and also doesn’t provide the essential assessment mechanisms. Overemphasis on testing takes time away from other educational priorities and also saps the enjoyment out of learning. The third alternative, the push for responsible testing seems to have broad base support throughout the community and I am in total agreement. If the state will over time deal with issues they have created, I am certain the public will respond appropriately and positively.
Public School education in many states may need to change. But we only move ahead if the changes improve learning and comprehension, not if they create dissention and compromise learning in favor of testing. We very much need responsible testing and we especially need responsible public officials to effectively manage change.
Labels:
exams,
public schools,
standardized testing
Monday, September 30, 2013
Conflict or Cooperation
Our
Business School is named for Frank Zarb who has had a remarkable career in
government and business including service as President Ford's energy czar. Because Mr. Zarb has had such a distinguished
career spanning almost half a century, we have been recording his oral history
to include with the Zarb papers and materials we already have in our
library. One video clip contains a
conversation between Representative John Dingell and Mr. Zarb and contains an important
lesson for today's government leaders. The lesson concerns cooperation between
the Democratic and Republican parties to successfully confront, what in their
case was the energy crisis. Cooperation
carried the day then; confrontation threatens our economic recovery today.
The fight
today is over health care, Obamacare as it is widely known, and instead of
cooperation we have escalating confrontation. I remember from when I was
growing up, the effort to pass Medicare and the efforts to discredit Medicare
as socialized medicine. I was persuaded
in those days that health care support for the elderly, especially the poor
elderly was an important responsibility of government in an affluent
society. Time has proven both the need
for and the merit in a system of support for the elderly just when they most
need access to health care.
The fight
against Obamacare has that same tone.
The message is we need to stop Uncle Sam before he takes over our health
care system. But we have so many
uninsured individuals and families that need help, that our affluent society
has a responsibility to do more. In addition
with our current system we have tremendous unrecovered health care costs and
the accompanying loss in productivity. For
these reasons, I support Obamacare but also understand the concern from the
critics.
Our
economy is in a fragile and halting recovery.
Inflation is still low, the unemployment rate is slowly dropping, the
GDP is increasing at a meaningful rate and the stock market has flirted with
record highs. Against this backdrop,
government is hitting a debt ceiling and there is an effort to tie any help
with the economy to a defunding and destroying of Obamacare.
We need
cooperation and even more we need for government leaders, both Democratic and
Republican to remember the pain of the recent recession and the need to
continue cultivating the recovery. Combining the health care bill with debt
ceiling legislation is a recipe for economic malaise. Where are the Frank Zarbs and John Dingells
of 2013?
Labels:
Affordable Care Act,
Cooperation,
economy,
Frank Zarb,
Obamacare
Monday, September 23, 2013
Good Food
Our common reading for all new
first year students was The Good Food Revolution and our
featured speaker during Welcome Week was Will Allen one of the book’s
co-authors. Both the book and the
presentation were well received and I totally agree that this is an important
message for all college students.
Will Allen is an imposing
figure. He still looks like the
basketball player he was in college and professionally and everything he says
is stated with passion and belief. When
he first started speaking to students, he announced that his PowerPoint
presentation was 1054 slides long.
Everyone laughed but 1054 slides later we were all more passionate and
more convinced.
In the beginning of his talk,
Will Allen talked about the connection between good health and good food. Both
are clearly inextricably interwoven and good food is a facilitator of good
health. Allen also talked about the importance of fertile soil, that is absent
of dangerous chemicals and he talked about the value and importance of urban
farming. His comments registered well with the students and registered equally
well with me and my colleagues also sitting in the audience.
Growing up, my diet was rich in
fruits and vegetables. We didn’t have
local farmers’ markets but we did have plenty of stores that specialized just
in fresh fruits and vegetables. My diet
was also rich (likely over-rich) in meats (especially beef) since my father was
a butcher and my parents owned a mom and pop butcher shop just around the corner
from where we lived. The best way to illustrate the family philosophy on meat
is that my father felt Thanksgiving, given its importance, should be celebrated
with a roast beef rather than with a roast turkey. And yes, in many of my early
years, the turkey lost out to the beef.
Ultimately we yelled foul (fowl) and my father agreed to change the menu
to the more traditional offering. My
diet growing up didn’t include soda, probably included too little sea food, and
eating out was not part of the offerings except on a few major holidays a year.
Fast foods were also not prevalent when I was growing up.
My kids love most fast foods and
would eat chicken nuggets for at least two meals a day if they had the
opportunity. I am appreciative that in
our school district there is a vigilant parents committee that reviews menus
and promotes healthy eating and we try to reinforce these values in what we
serve at home. And yet given how busy
everyone is we do eat out, and eat overly processed foods more than we should. And I seem to have passed my sweet tooth to
my kids.
What is most important about Will
Allen’s message is the emphasis on food education and food
growing/preparation. We should all buy
into The Good Food Revolution.
Monday, September 16, 2013
Welcome Week 2013 Speech to the Class of 2017
Since in my last blog I talked about what I was going to say
to our new first year undergraduate students, my blog for this week will be my
actual Welcome Week 2013 speech to the Class of 2017.
Good morning. I am Herman Berliner, Hofstra’s Provost and
Senior Vice President for Academic Affairs, and I am pleased to add my welcome
to Hofstra. For the last few weeks, I
have been thinking about what my message should be when today happens and I have
the opportunity to talk with you about your Hofstra experience and your
future. But before we talk about your
experience and your future, let’s move quickly into the future and go to year
2154. What is so special about that year
-- other than all of us will be more than 154 years old?
If you have seen Elysium, you will know that the movie
takes place at that time. In fact, it
starts by noting that in the year 2154, two classes of people exist, the very
wealthy who live on a pristine man-made space station called Elysium where all
disease has been eliminated and people live happily, healthily and affluently
ever after; and the rest of the population, who live on an overpopulated,
ruined Earth. Any effort to move from
earth to Elysium is thwarted; illegal immigrants to Elysium are simply killed.
Neill Blomkamp, the writer and
producer of Elysium, has not only
made a science fiction film; he also actually believes in this scenario. In an interview with The Guardian, Blomkamp, who
comes from South Africa, stated, “The issues raised by Elysium have been in existence as long as homo sapiens. You’d literally have to change the human
genome to stop wealth discrepancy.”
Neill continues by noting:
We have biological systems built
into us that were very advantageous for us, up until we became a functioning
civilization 10,000 years ago. We are
literally coded to preserve life, procreate and get food—and that’s not gonna
change. The question is whether you can
somehow overpower certain parts of the mammalian DNA and try to… take…away
wealth and pour it out for the rest of the planet.
I don’t believe the future will
really be this gloomy and I’m not here to convince you to see the movie but I
do want you to think about the future—both your future and the future of our
planet and humanity itself.
Let’s start by talking about
being at a University, either as a student or as a faculty member, staff
member, or administrator. Universities
are great places to be and Hofstra is a particularly great University. I’m an economist by training; quoting a
friend of mine, “an economist is someone who would have been an accountant but
didn’t have the personality.” Please
think about that. Meanwhile, in addition
to being an economist, I’m also interested in politics, education, the
environment, a little bit of basketball, cars and theater. I have been to almost every Broadway musical so
I know from first-hand experience that when our students put on a production of
Gypsy this fall it will certainly be
professional quality. Please go to see
it. Overall, no matter what your
interests are, the range and quality of what we offer on campus translates into
outstanding experiences. You can major
in pre-med; you can major in economics; you can major in education; or in
history or almost 140 other choices, but you can actually do so much more. Think about taking a course in another area
outside your major, take a minor, pursue a dual major—go to events on campus or
volunteer through our Center for Civic Engagement. Attend a lecture from our Kalikow Center for
the Study of the American Presidency.
Listen to a Pulitzer Prize winner as part of our Great Writers Great
Readings series. Participate in our fall
festival. In the past, we have had Jimmy
Fallon headline the fall festival comedy show and had performances by Cobra
Starship, Taking Back Sunday, Big Sean and Snoop Dogg as well as Rick
Ross. I don’t know who these groups or
performers are (other than Jimmy Fallon) but I may be the only provost who’s
taken his younger daughter to a One Direction concert and his older daughter to
the Jonas Brothers. In both cases my
hearing did come back within 48 hours.
Getting back to what we offer:
Make use of our fitness center, attend an athletic event, swim in our
pool. I’m a regular in the pool but I
claim no resemblance to Michael Phelps.
Actually, in sports I’m more like Mike Wazowski from Monsters
University. We have so many things happening that no one is able to go to
everything that happens on a 24/7 University campus. Don’t overdo it, but do
take advantage of what we offer. Many of
my interests developed when I was a college student. Take a chance. Try something new even if it isn’t in your
comfort zone. Open your mind. You won’t regret it and it can help you
secure a successful future.
Let’s go back to Elysium for a moment. If I were alive in
2154, I doubt that I would be part of the wealthy or privileged few who live in
this outer space paradise. More likely I
would be living on earth. Most of you
might be in the same situation. There is
still time to avoid such an Elysium scenario but the responsibility will rest
with you and your contemporaries to confront the issues that my generation has
not and is not fully confronting. Issues
that must be confronted if the earth is to become a better place to live rather
than a more “overpopulated” and “ruined planet.” We can clearly do so much better than a world
with a few haves and too many have nots.
Your Hofstra education will help
you deal with those problems and confront the issues that must be
resolved.
One more immediate issue that all
universities are dealing with is how to best promote, protect and uphold
academic integrity. To that end, we have
implemented an Honor Code which all of us are being asked to sign. I am steadfast in my commitment to the Honor
Code. Let me be very clear.
Plagiarism and other forms of
cheating do not represent your quest for knowledge. Instead, plagiarism is simply cheating and
constitutes presenting someone else’s work as your own.
One of my favorite stories
regarding academic dishonesty features two students in a history course who emailed
a faculty member a few hours after an exam was given in class indicating they
had a flat tire on the way to campus, and therefore could not take the exam at
that time. The faculty member asked them
both to come in to take a make-up, placed each of them in a separate room, and
gave them their make-up exams. First
question on each of their multiple choice exams was “The location of the tire
that went flat was a) driver’s side front, b) driver’s side rear, c) passenger
side front; d) passenger side rear.” The
results of the exam and the rest of this story really are history: each student
came up with a different answer to that question.
As diverse as we are, we must all
unite in stating it is simply unacceptable to cheat. Respect for integrity is inextricably
interwoven and essential to your success as a Hofstra student. So is respect for diversity. We are a diverse population at Hofstra but we
are also a microcosm of the planet.
Our University celebrates and
encourages diversity. As indicated in
our Diversity Mission Statement:
The University believes that
institutions of learning have a responsibility to provide and sustain multiple
cultures, to encourage scholarship and knowledge production incorporating
multiple perspectives and to demonstrate commitment to fair and equal access to
higher education.
Diversity includes the
recognition and incorporation of a multiplicity of voices and perspectives in
thought and action, in policy and practice, in all spheres of the academic
enterprise. It involves recognizing the
value of “difference” and the inclusion of members of groups that experience
discrimination or under representations.
Join with us in embracing
diversity.
Above all, view your education as
an opportunity, as a way of enhancing and fast- forwarding your future success
and as a time to enjoy.
Give it your best shot. We will be your partners.
I look forward to seeing you on
campus. And please stay in touch. Welcome again to Hofstra University, Class of
2017. Thanks and continued success.
Labels:
Class of 17,
Elysium,
new students,
speech,
Students,
Welcome Week
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)